Sell LA County Juvenile Hall Sex Abuse Settlement Payments
📅 Updated Sept 2026
⏱ 8-10 min read
Fill out the form below and a specialist will be in touch shortly
Thank You!
A specialist will be in touch with you shortly.
Call Now: (877) 269-1339
Last fact-checked September 17, 2026. This article provides general information, not legal, tax, or financial advice. Public information about these settlements is still developing. Your own settlement documents and attorney should guide any decision about your claim or payment.
Los Angeles County has approved two enormous settlements involving childhood sexual abuse claims. The first is worth $4 billion. The second is worth up to $828 million.
Those numbers are clear. The payment picture is not.
The County has begun funding the first settlement, but that does not mean every claimant has been paid. Thousands of people connected to two large law firms were still facing delays or reviews in September 2026. The public record also does not show one payment date, one award amount, or one payment structure that applies to everyone.
One more point needs to be clear from the start: the County’s five-year funding plan does not automatically give each claimant five annual payments that can be sold. An individual payment right may or may not qualify as a transferable structured settlement. The answer depends on the actual award, release, payment schedule, and settlement terms.
This guide separates what has been confirmed from what remains private or unsettled.
What's in this guide
- The Short Answer for Claimants
- Two Settlements Cover Different Claim Groups
- Where Payments Stand in September 2026
- How Much Will Each Claimant Receive?
- Three Payment Timelines Often Get Confused
- How the County Plans to Finance Group A
- Does the Settlement Use a Qualified Settlement Fund?
- Can You Sell an LA County Settlement Payment?
- How a Qualifying California Transfer Works
- Compare Offers Only After Eligibility Is Clear
- Is Early Cash Worth the Discount?
- Tax Treatment Needs Individual Review
- Protect Your Privacy During Any Review
- Red Flags Claimants Should Avoid
- Documents to Gather First
- California Legislation Is Still Moving
- Frequently Asked Questions
- Final Thoughts
The Short Answer for Claimants
- The Board of Supervisors approved the $4 billion settlement on April 29, 2025.
- A second settlement of up to $828 million was approved on October 28, 2025.
- The County originally described the first group as more than 6,800 claims. Later updates described more than 11,000 claimants.
- The County says it transferred roughly $571 million as the first major tranche, but that is not proof that every dollar reached individual claimants.
- No official public source provides a complete count of people who have been paid.
- No public formula tells you what an individual claim is worth.
- The five-year schedule applies to the County’s aggregate settlement funding. It does not prove that your personal award arrives in five installments.
- You should not assume that future payments can be sold. Transfer eligibility must be confirmed from your own documents.
Two Settlements Cover Different Claim Groups
News reports often place every claim under one $4 billion headline. The County actually approved two agreements involving separate lead cases.
| Detail | Group A | Group B |
|---|---|---|
| Maximum settlement value | $4 billion, plus about $15 million for administration | Up to $828 million |
| Board approval | April 29, 2025 | October 28, 2025 |
| Lead case | Jane Doe 1 et al. v. County of Los Angeles, 21STCV20949 | Jane BP1-B Doe et al. v. County of Los Angeles, 22STCV25961 |
| Public claim count | Initially more than 6,800 matters; later County statements referred to more than 11,000 claimants | Approximately 414 matters |
| Main departments and settings | Probation facilities, MacLaren Children's Center, DCFS and a smaller number of claims involving other County departments | Probation and DCFS |
| County funding structure | Five fiscal years beginning in FY 2025–26 | $400 million by December 1, 2025; up to $400 million within the next 12 months; up to $28 million within the following 12 months |
| Allocation | Independent allocation process | Independent allocators, including retired judges, considering claim severity and other factors |
The April 29 Board materials identify the Group A case and departments. The October 28 Board materials identify the separate Group B case, its approximate claim count, and its County funding schedule.
Why the Claim Count Changed
The 6,800 and 11,000 figures are not simply two sources disagreeing.
The County announced the tentative settlement in April 2025 as covering more than 6,800 claims. Later County reporting said the agreement represented more than 11,000 claimants after additional claims entered the process. The safest way to present the numbers is to attach each one to its date and source.
The County’s April announcement gives the original figure. Its October settlement update uses the later total.
What AB 218 Changed
California enacted Assembly Bill 218 in 2019, and it took effect on January 1, 2020. The law extended the time available for certain childhood sexual assault lawsuits and opened a three-year window for many claims that had already expired under earlier limitation periods.
AB 218 was a major reason so many older claims could move forward. It was not necessarily the only possible legal basis for every claim. Current limitation rules appear in Code of Civil Procedure section 340.1.
Cash Your Juvenile Hall Payments With MySettlement
Where Payments Stand in September 2026
There is no single settlement-wide payout date.
The County agreed to fund Group A across five fiscal years. Allocation, review, law-firm processing, liens, releases, and other claimant-level steps can create a second timeline after the County transfers money.
Here is the public timeline so far:
| Date | What Happened | What It Meant for Claimants |
|---|---|---|
| April 4, 2025 | County announced the tentative $4 billion agreement | Settlement still required formal approval |
| April 29, 2025 | Board approved Group A | County could proceed under the agreement and financing plan |
| October 28, 2025 | Board approved Group B for up to $828 million | A separate group received its own settlement framework |
| February 27, 2026 | County Counsel announced a formal investigation involving DTLA Law Group | Some claims and records faced added scrutiny |
| June 10, 2026 | District Attorney asked to intervene and pause disbursements through December 31 | The filing created uncertainty, but it did not automatically impose a stay |
| June 25, 2026 | Judge Lawrence Riff denied the DA's application | The requested freeze did not take effect |
| September 2026 | Reporting said roughly $571 million had been transferred, while distributions tied to two large firms remained delayed or under review | Money moving from the County did not mean every claimant had received payment |
The County’s February investigation announcement and the DA’s June court-application announcement describe the official actions. September reporting found that distributions involving about 3,700 Slater Slater Schulman clients and more than 2,700 DTLA Law Group clients were delayed or affected by ongoing reviews. It also reported the County’s roughly $571 million first-tranche figure. See the September 4 LA Times update.
Did the DA Freeze the Payments?
No. The DA asked the court for a six-month stay. Filing the request did not create the stay on its own.
The DA alleged that a preliminary database review suggested the percentage of potentially fraudulent claims could be as high as 81%. That was an allegation, not a final finding about 81% of the settlement. Claimants’ lawyers challenged both the method and its conclusions.
Judge Riff denied the application on June 25. Public reporting says he questioned the DA’s legal basis for entering the civil settlement proceeding and described the dispute as political. The June 26 LA Times report covers the ruling.
What the Judge Did Not Decide
The court did not rule that every claim was valid. It also did not rule that fraud had occurred across the settlement.
That distinction matters. A denied request to intervene is not a verdict on thousands of individual claims. Fraud reviews and a separate State Bar investigation were still active in September 2026.
Have Most Claimants Been Paid?
No authoritative public report answers that question across the entire settlement.
The evidence does show that distribution remained incomplete and that thousands of people connected to two large firms were affected by delays or reviews. It does not provide a reliable total for people who had:
- Received their final net payment
- Received an allocation but no money
- Had funds held by a law firm or administrator
- Faced a claim-specific review
- Remained in the allocation process
The accurate answer is not “everyone has been paid” or “nobody has been paid.” The accurate answer is that funding has begun, distribution remains uneven, and your attorney or settlement administrator is the best source for your individual status.
How Much Will Each Claimant Receive?
There is no public per-person amount.
Dividing $4 billion by 6,800 or 11,000 will not tell you what any claimant receives. Awards go through an allocation process, and claim values can differ significantly.
| Publicly Known | Not Publicly Established |
|---|---|
| Total maximum settlement values | One average award that applies to everyone |
| Approximate group sizes | The complete Group A allocation formula |
| Independent allocation process | Every claimant's category or score |
| Group B considers severity and uses independent allocators | One payment date for every claimant |
| County funding schedules | A universal claimant-level installment schedule |
Your award notice, release, payment schedule, and written communication from the settlement administrator or your lawyer matter far more than an online average.
Ask these questions in writing:
- Has my final award been approved?
- What is my gross award?
- What attorney fees, costs, liens, or holdbacks apply?
- What is my expected net amount?
- Is my award scheduled as one payment or more than one payment?
- Has the County or settlement fund transferred the money connected to my award?
- Is any review or hold affecting my claim?
Three Payment Timelines Often Get Confused
The settlement has three separate financial clocks. Mixing them together creates much of the confusion online.
| Timeline | Who It Applies To | What Public Records Show |
|---|---|---|
| County settlement funding | Los Angeles County | Group A aggregate obligations spread across five fiscal years beginning in FY 2025–26 |
| Individual claimant distribution | Each claimant | Depends on allocation, review, documents, deductions, and administration; no universal public schedule |
| County bond repayment | County and bondholders | Proposed financing may extend for up to 30 years, with continuing County costs through FY 2050–51 |
The County’s five-year funding structure is not proof that every claimant receives five annual checks. The bond timeline does not mean claimants wait until 2051.
Is the Five-Year Plan Optional?
No. It may have been designed around the County’s budget limits, but it became part of an enforceable settlement framework.
The County’s May 2025 financing resolution says the Group A master settlement agreement can be enforced under Code of Civil Procedure section 664.6. A later Board cannot treat the obligation as a casual budget promise.
That does not guarantee perfect timing. Administrative disputes, investigations, litigation, and financing issues can still cause delays. It does mean the blog should not describe future funding as money the County may freely choose to cancel.
How the County Plans to Finance Group A
The Board authorized a plan involving judgment obligation bonds. That action created a financing route; it did not, on its own, prove that every contemplated bond had already been issued.
The proposed bonds could run for up to 30 years. The County relied on the California constitutional exception for obligations imposed by law and pursued a validation process rather than a public vote.
The Board materials included this illustration for each $1 billion financed:
| Illustrative Assumption | Board Estimate |
|---|---|
| Principal financing discussed | $1 billion |
| True interest cost | Approximately 6.32% |
| Estimated total payments | Approximately $2.249 billion |
| Maximum stated term | Up to 30 years |
Those figures were estimates, not the final cost of bonds actually sold. Market rates, issue size, timing, and final bond terms can change the result.
Does the Settlement Use a Qualified Settlement Fund?
Possibly, but the public sources reviewed for this article do not establish the exact fund structure used for every claimant.
A qualified settlement fund, usually shortened to QSF, can hold settlement assets while claims and distributions are handled. Treasury Regulation section 1.468B-1 generally requires the fund to be approved by a court or another qualifying governmental authority, remain under that authority’s jurisdiction, resolve qualifying claims, and keep its assets legally separated.
Here is what a QSF would and would not tell you:
| A QSF Can | A QSF Does Not Automatically Do |
|---|---|
| Hold settlement assets separately | Prove your award is final |
| Support claim administration and distribution | Guarantee your personal payment date |
| Receive money or qualifying property under federal tax rules | Make your payment rights transferable |
| Earn taxable investment income | Automatically release the County from every obligation |
A QSF is generally taxed on modified gross income. Settlement contributions are usually excluded from that calculation, while investment income and some other income may be included. See Treasury Regulation section 1.468B-2.
Treasury Regulation section 1.468B-3 contains tax-accounting rules for transfers to a QSF. It does not create a claimant payment schedule or independently require the County to deposit cash on a particular date.
Can You Sell an LA County Settlement Payment?
The honest short answer is: not enough public information exists to give every claimant a yes.
Some claimants may eventually hold payment rights a buyer is willing and legally able to purchase. Others may receive one lump sum, hold nonassignable rights, or have an arrangement that does not meet the legal definition of a structured settlement.
The County’s five-year funding plan alone does not answer the question.
What California Calls a Structured Settlement
California Insurance Code section 10134 defines a structured settlement as an arrangement for periodic payment of damages in resolution of a tort claim under which the payments are tax-free. “Structured settlement payment rights” are the payee’s rights to receive those payments under the agreement.
That creates three basic questions:
- Does your final agreement give you defined future periodic payments?
- Are those payments covered by the tax and legal definition?
- Does your agreement allow a transfer, and will the obligor recognize it?
An award amount alone is not enough.
Government Installment Statutes Add a Complication
California Government Code sections 970.6 and 984 allow certain public-entity judgments to be paid over time under specific conditions.
Insurance Code section 10134 says that a structured settlement entered under those statutes is not subject to most of California’s Structured Settlement Protection Act, apart from section 10138. That means the familiar transfer process used for an ordinary annuity-backed structured settlement may not apply if a claimant’s payment arrangement arises under one of those government statutes.
This is one reason a buyer cannot answer the LA County question by looking only at the settlement headline.
Federal Law Does Not Make the Rights Transferable
26 U.S.C. section 5891 generally imposes a 40% excise tax on the factoring discount when a qualifying structured settlement transfer lacks a qualifying court order. The tax normally falls on the acquiring company.
That federal rule does not create a right to sell. It also does not override an anti-assignment clause, force the County to recognize a buyer, or turn the County’s funding schedule into an individual structured settlement.
Check Your Documents Before Requesting Quotes
| What Your Documents Show | Practical Meaning |
|---|---|
| Claim is still pending or award is not final | There may be no existing payment right to sell |
| Final award is payable as one lump sum | There may be no future payment stream to transfer |
| Final documents list fixed future amounts and dates | A qualified attorney or buyer can begin a transferability review |
| Agreement prohibits assignment | A sale may be unavailable unless the restriction can legally be addressed |
| Rights arise under Government Code sections 970.6 or 984 | Most of the ordinary California transfer statute may not apply |
| Obligor or administrator will not recognize a transfer | A buyer may be unable or unwilling to proceed |
26 U.S.C. section 5891 generally imposes a 40% excise tax on the factoring discount when a qualifying structured settlement transfer lacks a qualifying court order. The tax normally falls on the acquiring company.
That federal rule does not create a right to sell. It also does not override an anti-assignment clause, force the County to recognize a buyer, or turn the County’s funding schedule into an individual structured settlement.
How a Qualifying California Transfer Works
This section applies only if a document review confirms that you own structured settlement payment rights eligible for transfer.
Step 1: Confirm the Payment Rights
Gather the final award, release, payment schedule, and any assignment restrictions. The buyer should identify the exact payments it proposes to purchase.
Step 2: Review the Written Disclosure
California law requires a disclosure showing important transaction figures, including the payments being transferred, discounted present value, gross advance, expenses, and net amount.
Step 3: Consider Independent Advice
You must be told that you have the right to seek independent professional advice. Under Insurance Code section 10139.5, the transferee must pay up to $1,500 for qualifying independent professional advice when the statutory conditions are met.
Step 4: File the Court Petition
The buyer files a petition for advance approval. Interested parties receive notice at least 20 days before the hearing.
Step 5: Let the Judge Review the Deal
The judge must decide that the transfer is in your best interest, considering your welfare and support obligations to dependents. The court can also consider your age, finances, purpose for the money, prior transfers, other income, and any other relevant facts.
Step 6: Complete the Transfer Only After Approval
The transfer is not effective unless the court approves it. If approval is denied, the proposed transaction does not go forward.
There is no reliable 45-to-90-day promise in California law. Timing depends on eligibility, documents, notice, court scheduling, objections, and the final order.
Who Pays the Court Costs?
California law places court costs and filing fees for a qualifying transfer on the transferee. They should not be presented as ordinary deductions from your proceeds.
Always inspect the disclosure for other transaction expenses and compare the net cash, not only the large number at the top of an offer.
Can You Sell Only Part?
A partial transfer may be possible, but it is not guaranteed.
California law says the settlement obligor or annuity issuer cannot be required to split one periodic payment between you and the buyer. A workable partial transaction might involve transferring complete future payments while keeping other complete payments. Selling a percentage of every check may not work unless the documents and payment administrator allow it.
Compare Offers Only After Eligibility Is Clear
Looking at more than one offer is sensible consumer practice, but California’s statute does not name comparison shopping as a separate legal requirement.
Use this table after transfer eligibility has been confirmed:
| Question | Why It Matters |
|---|---|
| Which exact payments are being purchased? | “Part of your settlement” is too vague |
| What is the gross advance? | This is the starting offer before expenses |
| What is the net amount paid to you? | This is the cash you actually receive |
| What discount rate or equivalent cost is used? | It shows the price of receiving money early |
| Which expenses appear in the disclosure? | Every deduction should be visible |
| Who pays filing and court costs? | California places them on the transferee for a qualifying transfer |
| What happens if the petition is denied? | You should not owe a penalty merely because approval fails |
| Will the County or administrator recognize the transfer? | A court order alone may not cure every contractual problem |
| How will personal claim records be protected? | These files may contain highly sensitive information |
No responsible company should quote a reliable lump sum before seeing the amount and date of each transferable payment. Generic examples can be badly misleading, so this guide does not publish made-up sale values.
Is Early Cash Worth the Discount?
That decision begins only after you know a transfer is legally available.
| Your Situation | First Option to Examine | Main Tradeoff |
|---|---|---|
| Urgent housing, health, or safety expense | Smallest available transfer that covers the need | Less future value is surrendered |
| High-interest debt | Compare the debt cost against the transfer's full cost | A lower monthly burden may still cost a large future amount |
| Stable finances and no urgent need | Keep the payments | Preserves more future value |
| Dependents rely on future income | Keep payments or transfer fewer complete payments | Protects future household cash flow |
| Offer is difficult to understand | Pause and obtain independent advice | Delay is better than signing an unclear contract |
| Payment rights are not yet final | Speak to your claim attorney | A factoring transaction may not be legally available |
A sale is not a loan when it is a true transfer of payment rights. You receive less than the future total because the buyer waits to collect and prices in time, risk, expenses, and profit. The discount can be substantial.
Tax Treatment Needs Individual Review
Internal Revenue Code section 104 may exclude nonpunitive damages received on account of personal physical injuries or physical sickness. Emotional distress is not treated as a physical injury on its own, apart from qualifying medical-expense rules. Interest, punitive damages, and amounts tied to other claims can receive different treatment.
Do not assume the entire award is tax-free simply because the underlying claim involved abuse. The wording and allocation in your settlement documents matter. The IRS settlement and judgment guidance explains the general approach.
A qualified court order under section 5891 addresses the federal excise tax on a factoring transaction. It does not answer every personal income-tax question for the claimant. Ask a tax professional to review both the award and any proposed transfer agreement.
Protect Your Privacy During Any Review
A transfer petition can require personal information about your age, address, family, income, dependents, and financial need. Court filings are not automatically sealed.
Before sharing an award packet, ask:
- Which documents does the company need right now?
- Who can view them?
- Will they be shared with affiliated companies or outside buyers?
- How long will the records be kept?
- Which details would appear in a court petition?
- Will an attorney seek sealing or redaction where legally available?
No buyer can promise that every court record will remain private.
Red Flags Claimants Should Avoid
Pause if a company or representative:
- Guarantees that every LA County award can be sold
- Calls the County’s five-year funding plan your personal payment schedule
- Gives a firm quote before reviewing payment amounts and dates
- Says court approval is automatic or unnecessary
- Ignores anti-assignment language
- Claims federal law forces the County to recognize a transfer
- Pressures you to sign before speaking with your lawyer
- Hides the net amount, discount, or transaction expenses
- Says statutory court filing costs must come from your proceeds
- Promises a fixed completion date
- Asks for sensitive abuse records that are not needed for an initial eligibility review
Documents to Gather First
| Document | What It Helps Confirm |
|---|---|
| Final award notice | Award status and gross amount |
| Executed release or settlement agreement | Conditions, restrictions, and governing terms |
| Individual payment schedule | Amounts and dates, if future payments exist |
| Allocation statement | How the award was determined |
| Attorney closing statement | Fees, costs, liens, and expected net amount |
| Administrator correspondence | Payment status and any active hold |
| Assignment language | Whether a transfer is restricted or permitted |
Keep your original files. Send copies only through a secure method.
California Legislation Is Still Moving
Earlier versions of this article described Senate Bill 577 as dead. That is no longer accurate.
As of September 17, 2026, SB 577 had passed both legislative houses, was enrolled on September 1, and was presented to the Governor on September 8. It was not yet safe to describe it as enacted law. The bill addresses several public-entity claim and financing issues, including child sexual abuse claims and fraud protections.
Check the official SB 577 status and legislative history before relying on it after this article’s fact-check date.
Frequently asked questions
When is the LA County settlement payout date?
There is no single public payout date for every claimant. Group A is funded across five County fiscal years beginning in FY 2025–26, but individual distribution depends on allocation, review, administration, and claim documents.
How much is each LA County settlement claim worth?
No public average applies to individual claims. Your final award notice and closing statement are the reliable sources for your gross and net figures.
Has Los Angeles County started paying the settlement?
Yes. The County said roughly $571 million had been transferred as the first major tranche. That does not mean every claimant received money. Thousands of distributions remained delayed or under review in September 2026.
Did the judge find that the claims were fraudulent?
No. Judge Riff denied the DA’s request to intervene and pause payments. The ruling did not decide the validity of every claim or end the ongoing investigations.
What is the second $828 million settlement?
Group B is a separate agreement covering approximately 414 matters in Jane BP1-B Doe et al. v. County of Los Angeles, 22STCV25961. It is not the same lead case as Group A.
Will every claimant receive five annual payments?
Public records do not say that. Five fiscal years describes the County’s aggregate Group A funding plan, not a universal individual payment schedule.
Can I sell my LA County settlement payments?
Possibly, but only if your final documents create eligible, transferable future payment rights. The public settlement announcement is not enough to answer that question. Ask an attorney to review your award, payment schedule, assignment terms, and the legal basis for the payments.
Does every transfer require a California court order?
An ordinary qualifying structured settlement transfer under California’s Structured Settlement Protection Act requires advance court approval. Special statutory arrangements under Government Code sections 970.6 or 984 are excluded from most of that Act, so the usual process may not apply.
How long would a transfer take?
No law promises a 45-to-90-day result. Eligibility review, required notice, court scheduling, objections, and the settlement documents all affect timing.
Can I sell only part of the future payments?
Maybe. A partial transfer must fit the contract and payment administration. California law does not let a buyer force the obligor to divide one periodic payment between two recipients.
What if my award is not final yet?
You may not have an existing payment right to sell. Speak with your claim attorney before considering any company that offers money connected to a pending claim.
Are the settlement payments tax-free?
Some compensatory damages for physical injuries may be excluded under federal law. Other components can be taxable. Only a professional who reviews your documents can give a reliable answer for your award.
Final thoughts
The two LA County settlements are historic, but the headline totals tell claimants very little about their own award or payment date.
Start with your documents. Confirm that the award is final. Ask for the gross amount, deductions, net amount, and payment timing in writing. If your paperwork lists future payments and you are considering early cash, confirm that the rights are transferable before discussing a price.
MySettlement.org can help you identify the documents a payment buyer would need and connect you with companies that evaluate qualifying payment rights. An initial review is not a promise that an LA County award can be sold. No transfer should move forward until eligibility, terms, costs, privacy, and court requirements are clear.
Your settlement deserves more than a quick sales pitch. Get the facts first, then decide what works for your life.
This article provides general information and does not create an attorney-client, tax-adviser, or financial-adviser relationship. MySettlement.org connects individuals with third-party companies and is not itself a structured settlement purchaser. Availability depends on the payment type, governing documents, applicable law, and court or obligor requirements. Results vary.
Your settlement has a number. Let's make it work for you.
Get a free, no obligation quote from a specialist who actually knows what your payments are worth.